Sign in or 

People just like you can add or edit the content on this site. If you want to try editing, but aren't ready to add to this site, try our demo area.
Read more about editing pages at Wetpaint Central.
)
| Don’t miss the National Symposium on Child & Youth Mental Health with its full day on schools and its virtual sessions from different parts of the country…May 31/June 1, 2012. Register here. |
|
- access to the extensive ISHN research/news/resources clipping service monitoring over 150 journals, over 75 media outlets and over 75 social media sources to bring a constant stream of brief info items with web links. Organizational memberships provide access to SH events for up to 15 employees.
|
Highlights From October 2011
See all of the postings for October 2012 here | Highlights from November 2011
| Highlights from December 2011
|
· Advances in School Mental Health
· Psychology in the Schools
· School Psychology Quarterly
· Canadian Journal of School Psychology
· School Psychology International
· Professional School Counselling
· School Mental Health
· Educational Psychology in Practice
· International Journal of Mental Health Promotion
· Clinical Psychologist
· Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
· Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
· Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
· Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
· American Psychologist
· Journal of Community Psychology
· Psychiatric Services
· Applied Psychology, Health & Well-being
· Child and Adolescent Mental Health
· Advances in Mental Health
· Journal of Pediatric Psychology
· Psychological Bulletin
· Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
· Mind, Brain, and Education
· Journal of Health & Social Behaviour
· The Counselling Psychologist
· Educational Psychology
· Journal of Canadian Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
· Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health
· Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
· Archives of Suicide Research
· Journal of Personality Disorders
· Schizophrenia Research
· Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
· Journal of Addictive Diseases
· Emotion
· Journal of Affective Disorders
· Journal of Social Psychology
· Community Mental Health
· Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
· Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention
· fourteen school-focused journals focused on promoting health, safety, and other issues (eg Journal of School Health, Journal of School Violence)
· Thirty-six journals on public health and preventive medicine (eg Public Health Practice, European Journal of Public Health, )
· Thirty-two journals on education (eg Educational Leadership, Teaching & Teacher Education)
· Twenty four journals on child and adolescent development (eg Journal of Adolescent Health, Pediatrics)
· Nine journals on addictions and substance abuse (eg Addictions)
· Eleven journals on nutrition and healthy eating (eg Public Health Nutrition)
· Seven journals on physical activity (eg Journal of Physical Activity and Health)
· Fourteen journals on violence, crime and bullying (eg Journal of Emotional and Behavioural Disorders)
· Twelve journals on accidents and injuries (eg Accident Prevention and Analysis)
· Ten journals on hygiene, infectious diseases and vaccines (eg Vaccines, International Health)
· Four journals on personal, social, moral and religious development (eg Int Journal on Children’s Spirituality)
· Eight journals on family studies and home economics (eg Journal of Family and Child Studies)
· Twelve journals on sexual and reproductive health (eg Sex, Sex Education, Society and Learning)
· Eleven journals on social services, social work and child protection (eg Journal of Social Work)
· Eight journals on sustainable development and environmental education (eg Journal of Environmental Education)
· Ten journals focused on equity, place and community (eg Urban Studies, journal of Children and Poverty)
· Three journals focused on diversity, race and human rights (eg Journal of Aboriginal Health
· Twenty one journals on low income, developing countries (eg International Journal of Educational Development)
· Eight journals from various UN agencies (eg WHO Bulletin, UNESCO, OECD)
Articles from Issue #1, 2012 of School Mental Health
· Promoting Children’s Prosocial Behaviors in School: Impact of the “Roots of Empathy” Program on the Social and Emotional Competence of School-Aged Children
· The Impact of Working Alliance, Social Validity, and Teacher Burnout on Implementation Fidelity of the Good Behavior Game
· The Modified Depression Scale (MDS): A Brief, No-Cost Assessment Tool to Estimate the Level of Depressive Symptoms in Students and Schools
· Perceived Weight Status Effect on Adolescent Health-Risk Behaviors: Findings from 2007 and 2009 Rhode Island Youth Risk Behavioral Survey
· An Examination of the Scope and Nature of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Online Activities: Implications for School Mental Health Professionals
· www.health-evidence.ca
· New Zealand Health Technology Assessment
· Health Technology Assessment (UK)
· National Institute on Clinical Excellence (UK)
· Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (UK)
· The Guide to Community Prevention Services (USA)
· Cochrane Library (Database of Systematic Reviews)
· IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Canada (Sun Life Chair in Adolescent Mental Health)
· Collaborative on Academic, Social & Emotional Learning (United States)
· Canadian Best Practices Portal (Interventions Linked with Systematic Reviews)
o Comprehensive approaches that address multiple issues including mental health, delivering multiple interventions from systems including schools and working from multiple levels within those systems
o Coordinated agency-school programs delivering multiple interventions at the school board and agency level that focus on mental health or aspects of mental health
o Whole school strategies that motivate educators (only) employed in schools to deliver multiple interventions focused on mental health or specific aspects of mental health or mental illnesses
Several reviews combined evaluations of different types of interventions such as universal instructional interventions delivered by teachers with group-based or individual therapy, brief counselling or education programs under the heading of “school-based programs”. Researchers would hardly dare to group all of the interventions delivered in “hospital-based programs” in the same systematic reviews and it is equally inappropriate here. Consequently, given the limitations and confusion noted above, the authors often conclude that results vary widely.
Outline of Topics related to SMH (Taken from the ISHN World Encyclopedia) | Systematic Reviews (Taken from SMH Bibliography/Toolbox Monitoring Research Reviews) |
| A. Understanding the Problem | |
| Overview The synthesis done by the International School Health Network (ISHN) of over 25 school-based and school-linked models of child/youth development and prevention/promotion suggests that we should address the needs of the whole child in a positive, principled values-based approach over the life course. We need to understand the health/social problem thoroughly and the impact of the school on the problems. | |
| A-1 Prevalence, Perceptions & Nature of the Problem Among Young People (Including holistic understanding of the problem and comprehensive approaches to program/policy/practice development) Defining Mental Health There appears to be little consensus on what we all mean by mental health, with competition for attention from those promoting one extreme (positive mental health) and those that are still using a treatment model. There is also a very vague understanding of the interactions between MH and other health social problems. Researchers may also be ignoring the middle of the MH continuum that describes MH problems caused by stressful life events such as divorce or loneliness. Meanwhile, the established mental health movement has largely ignored the health issue most closely associated with suicide (homophobic bullying causing teen suicide and self-harm). Power et al (2008) suggest that “there is wide diversity of opinion about definitions of adjustment and mental health in the youth area. Most current opinion (Stewart-Brown, 2002) inclines to a view of positive well-being rather than simply absence of symptoms of psychopathology. Concepts such as emotional literacy are assuming increasing importance (Brackett, 2007). Positive psychological approaches (Seligman, 1998) target a range of social competencies (support-seeking, problem–solving, resiliency, etc.). Weare (2000) views adjustment mainly in social terms. Strength-based psychological approaches (such as that of Mentality) contrast markedly with deficit models, which are often aligned closely with traditional medical diagnostic systems such as DSM IV.” In an effort to clarify things and enable schools to focus on specific issues, the International School Health Network has combined several formal statements and definitions to collect research and resources under four intertwined categories:
Wells et al (2003) suggest that social and emotional skills are not quite the same thing as mental health. The distinction between measures of ‘‘skill’’ and measures of positive mental health or interpersonal behaviour is complex. Lack of problem-solving skills, conflict resolution and negotiating skills is a risk factor for poor relationships with others and for mental health problems. Improvements in these skills are likely to lead to improvements in mental health. However, positive mental health items can be included in skill-based measures, e.g. interpersonal sensitivity in the problem solving measure used by Battistich et al. (1989). They took the view that wholly skill-based measures were not measures of mental health and excluded studies which only measured skills, for example, in a classroom role-play situation. Some of the included studies, however, recorded these sorts of measurements as well as measures of mental health and one of the included studies showed positive results only on one of these skill-based measures. Prevalence of Mental Health Strengths and Problems While there are numerous studies and reports on the prevalence of mental health problems and illnesses and, more recently on the prevalence of individual psychological assets and protective conditions, we did not locate any research reviews or syntheses that identify trends. Consequently, we are left with a basic question left unanswered: Is the mental health of children and youth getting worse or better? | |
| A-2 Specific Individual Strengths, Problems/Risks, Personal Behaviours, Conditions, Chronic/Genetic Factors, Sub-Populations, Stages in Life Course related to the issue (These can be a focus on higher risk populations or particularly important factors relevant to the issue) The ISHN synthesis suggests that programs should address the needs of the whole child (intellectual, social, physical, psychological, emotional) and identify and address all of the health/social/ economic problems, assets, factors and conditions that affect their health, learning and development. The child's development will be affected by several social influences and determinants. There are several behaviour theories to explain the complex interactions that occur among the child, family, neighbourhood, community and the school. Our regular visits to the research review web sites did not locate many research reviews documenting the various individual factors, social influences and social determinants that obviously affect mental health. These factors and conditions include children and youth who are living with a family member with mental illness, child abuse or neglect, who have suffered trauma, bereavement or divorce, who have been adopted, who are obese or who live with another chronic disease or who have higher coping skills/resilience, Remarkably, the only two reviews in this section examined the impact of physical activity on mental health and ignored almost all of the other conditions and factors. Our regular monitoring of various research journals informs us that studies and correlations have been done on the many other aspects of MH but it appears that no systematic reviews have been done to explore their relative impact or significance. | Children/youth Living with a Family Member with a Debilitating Condition or Terminal Illness
|
| Social Influences (Media, Social Media, Parents, Peers, Norms, Beliefs, etc) While many of the research reviews examined in this preliminary list did discuss the effects of different interventions in modifying or helping students to understand various social influences such as parents, peers, social norms and the media, this preliminary investigation did not find any research reviews that used those influences as the lens for their research. | Children/Youth with Higher or lower Numbers of trusted Friends
|
| Social Determinants (Economic status, gender, level of education, etc.) While a few of the research reviews examined in this preliminary work did discuss the effects of different interventions in different social and economic contexts, the current list of systematic research reviews in our bibliography did not find any items that provided comparisons of the mental health of young people in those various circumstances and communities. | Children/Youth living in Economically Depressed Communities
|
| Mental Health Over the Life Course The ISHN Synthesis suggests that programs should be based on a recognition that health and social behaviours, personal health & physical conditions as well as knowledge/attitudes and skills occur and develop over the life course. For mental health, programs should be based on evidence and experience in dealing with these important age-related concepts: o Adolescent Development, The research reviews currently in the SMH bibliography/toolbox do not identify any systematic reviews using these life course/transitions factors. Our monitoring of recent research suggests that brain development and transitions are emerging as important topics but they do not appear to have reached the level of systematic reviews. | Synthesis of studies on life course topics and mental health
|
| A-3 Behavioral Theories that Explain the Issue or Approaches to Promotion/Prevention (These can also include a focus on higher risk populations or particularly important behaviours or conditions relevant to the problem) The ISHN synthesis suggests that there are several behaviour theories to explain the complex interactions that occur among the child, family, neighbourhood, community and the school. A number of behaviour theories are being used to explain how mental health develops, including: Attachment Theory/Connectedness, Family Systems, Health Belief, Multiple Intelligences, Resilience, Social intelligence, Social Learning, Cognitive-Behavioural, Self-Determination, Stages of Change/Transtheoretical, Stigma/Accessing Help, Social Influences and more. However, with a few exceptions (Cognitive-Behaviour Therapy, Social Intelligence/Social Learning), there appear to be few systematic reviews that group interventions in accordance with their such behaviour theories despite the fact that recent controlled trials are using such frameworks more often. | Cognitive Behavior Therapy
|
| B. Impact of the School on the Problem/issue Overview The ISHN synthesis suggests that programs should be based on a clear understanding of the influence of the social and physical environment of the school on the health or social problem being addressed. For Mental Health, the aspects of the school's environment and school practices that need to be addressed include: the physical environment of the school (lighting, air quality, etc.), the social environment (school discipline, staff-student relations, parent involvement, student-student relations, the transitions between levels of schooling, school practices and policies on promoting/failing and recognizing students and other aspects. Interventions should seek to change these factors while recognizing that many of these aspects are embedded in societal, community and family norms. Once again, we note that while there are several recent articles and studies being published on the impact of the “normal” school physical/social environment and school practices on MH, these studies have not yet been grouped in systematic reviews. | Impact of the school social and physical environment and school organization, practices on mental health
|
| B-1 Influence of the School Social Environment on the Problem (This includes student-teacher conduct & relationships, co-curricular and after-school clubs and activities, staff morale, relationships between the school and parents, overall school climate/ethos and more. | |
| B-2 Influence of the School Physical Environment on the Problem (This includes school grounds, transportation routes to school, gymnasia and playgrounds, lighting, proximity to fast-food restaurants, exposure to advertising, municipal parks, busy city streets, high crime areas or natural green areas, access to municipal and other cultural facilities, age of the building, natural light, easy access to and quality of the water) | |
| B-3 Influence of School Organization, Practices (These include age/grade groupings, physical size, location and facilities of the school, age/experience/mobility of the teachers, basic school operations such as transportation/busing, lunches, recesses, and important social rituals in the school such as school assemblies, proms, graduation ceremonies, parent/teacher nights and more.) | |
| B-4 Influence of the School related Transitions (These include transitions from other schools, family/pre-school into primary school, between primary and secondary schools, secondary schools to post-secondary education/training or into the work force.) | |
| C. Effectiveness of Multi-Intervention Approaches, Programs and Strategies on the Problem, Aspects of the Problem This section includes research reviews and studies that specifically report on multi-intervention approaches and programs only. Many research reviews do not differentiate between multi-intervention and single intervention programs. The reviews on individual interventions are reported under Section D (which examines the effect of single intervention programs) (Please note the differences between comprehensive approaches (multi-issue, multi-level, multi-agency programs), coordinated agency-school programs (involving personnel from several agencies and professions in implementation) and whole-school Programs (HPS) involving only school-based personnel) | |
| General Overview (Including reviews that do not specify which interventions are being examined) The current list of research reviews in the SMH Bibliography/Toolbox included several reviews that did not differentiate (at least in their respective abstracts) among multi-intervention and single intervention programs. Nor did they clearly describe who (which agencies, professionals or educators) were actually responsible for delivering the program, service or policy. They were often grouped, creating some confusion, under the traditional primary, secondary and tertiary We also found several articles and summaries in the SMH Bibliography/Toolbox that addressed the question as to whether multi-intervention programs were more effective or cost-effective relative to single interventions.
|
|
| C-1 Consensus Statements, Published Multi-Intervention Plans, Models and Frameworks The ISHN synthesis suggests that policy-makers, officials, administrators, and practitioners should build or select and established a comprehensive approach while simultaneously addressing specific urgent issues or the elements/programs within a coordinated set of interventions. This means that data on child/youth needs as well as other needs and capacities should be assessed regularly. Relevant multiple interventions should then be identified and coordinated in a recognized school multiple intervention approach or program. Such holistic approaches can address clusters of problems and conditions using combinations of synergistic programs policies, services and other interventions. Programs then should be developed and implemented at multiple levels within systems and across several systems and then delivered using the school as a hub. The articulation of a widely recognized model for promoting mental health through schools is just recently started with organizations such as the International Alliance for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (InterCAMHS) and several NGO’s in Canada both working on drafts. The example of a “strategic framework” provided by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in the UK (shown to the right) is another example of how policy-makers and practitioners are developing their own models. However, there are several well-established models/frameworks/statements for organizing multiple interventions related to or focused on aspects of mental health. The Social-Emotion al Learning framework is a concept related to mental health that has been used in several systematic reviews. The ISHN has collected several of these approaches related to mental health:
|
- Enable all secondary education establishments to adopt an organisation-wide approach to promoting the social and emotional wellbeing of young people. This should encompass organisation and management issues as well as the curriculum and extra-curriculum provision. The approach should form part of the local children and young people’s plan and joint commissioning. It should also be linked to the local area agreement. It should help achieve the Every Child Matters (ECM) Outcome Framework wellbeing objectives and targets (HM Government 2004). It should also contribute towards efforts to gain National Healthy Schools Status (NHSS). |
| C-2 Effectiveness of Comprehensive Approaches (These approaches are looking at the whole child, not just one or a few health/social problems. all children (especially vulnerable), developmental stages/life course, clusters of behaviours and conditions(eg mental health, crime, tobacco, sexual risk-taking, dropouts), community and systems context analysis, synergistic combinations of strategies and initiatives (eg police officers, safe schools, character education, early childhood programs), multi-level , intersectorial strategies, programs and policies) Wei & Kutcher (2011) suggest that programs that integrated multiple settings (home, school, community) with primary prevention and skills-building (cognitive behavioral strategies and social skills enhancement) approaches had the strongest evidence of effectiveness across age ranges and studies. Our searching of the SMH Bibliography/Toolbox found very few research reviews on what we call “comprehensive approaches” (multi-issues, multi-systems, multi-levels) to school mental health promotion. (Most were either focused on mental health alone or were focused on coordinated agency-school programs or whole school strategies alone) | |
| On overall health and development (eg bullying/aggression, overweight/obesity, physical activity, sexual risk-taking, educational achievement/school dropout etc) Wei & Kutcher (2011) suggest that programs that integrated multiple settings (home, school, community) with primary prevention and skills-building (cognitive behavioral strategies and social skills enhancement) approaches had the strongest evidence of effectiveness across age ranges and studies. |
|
| n the Issue of Mental Health in General | |
| On specific aspects, behaviours, conditions related to the Mental Health | |
| Promoting Positive Mental Health (Including psychological well-being, social and psychological assets, mental health literacy, spiritual/religious beliefs, mindfulness/self-knowledge, self-esteem, attachment, social and emotional learning etc) | |
| Preventing or reducing Mental Health Problems (Including difficulties in transitions, resilience, bereavement, stress/distress, social isolation/loneliness, divorce/family breakdown, having parent with mental illness etc) | |
| Addressing Interactions with other Health/Social Problems (Including intellectual, physical and learning disabilities, teen pregnancy/adoption, sexual health/risk-taking, sexual orientation, child sexual abuse, child abuse & neglect, family violence, bullying/aggression, discrimination based on gender, race, language, religion, substance abuse, chronic disease, genetic conditions, trauma from violence, poverty, homelessness/transience, cultural oppression/colonization, being able to access MH services etc.) | |
| Delaying/Preventing Onset or Managing Mental Illness and Disorders (Including ADHD, FASD, overcoming stigma/seeking help, anxiety, phobias, eating disorders, behavior disorders, emotional/mood disorders, depression, aggression, self-harm, suicide, bi-polar disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis, other disorders etc.) Wei & Kutcher (2011) suggest that universal programs including education and cognitive– behavioral therapy (CBT) skills do not overall show evidence of preventing depression. There is some evidence that selected and indicated programs based on evidence based clinical approaches (CBT and interpersonal therapy) have some impact in reducing depression symptoms in the short term. | |
| C-3. Effectiveness of Coordinated Agency-School Programs and Services | |
| On overall health and development (eg bullying/aggression, overweight/obesity, physical activity, sexual risk-taking, educational achievement/school dropout etc.) | |
| On the issue of overall mental health This preliminary investigation found several reviews on in the SMH Bibliography/Toolbox that support the idea that coordinated agency-school board multi-intervention programs will improve overall mental health as well as several specific aspects of mental health. However, many of those reviews noted that several questions about duration, intensity, sustainability and cost-effectiveness need to be answered. |
|
| On specific aspects, behaviours, conditions related to the issue Research and experience with almost all of the various models and frameworks promoting health and social development through schools suggest that programs should focus on specific behaviours, influences or conditions related to that issue. Most of the research reviews identified on the selected web sites were focused on such specific aspects of mental health, quite often addressing mental illnesses or problems. | |
| Promoting Positive Mental Health (Including psychological well-being, social and psychological assets, mental health literacy, spiritual/religious beliefs, mindfulness/self-knowledge, self-esteem, attachment, social and emotional learning This search through the SMH Bibliography/Toolbox found research reviews supporting the effectiveness of coordinated agency-school board programs on one aspect of mental health (i.e. SEL) but not on other aspects of “positive mental health”. | Social & Emotional Learning
|
| Addressing Interactions with other Health/Social Problems (Including intellectual, physical and learning disabilities, teen pregnancy/adoption, sexual health/risk-taking, sexual orientation, child sexual abuse, child abuse & neglect, family violence, bullying/aggression, discrimination based on gender, race, language, religion, substance abuse, chronic disease, genetic conditions, trauma from violence, poverty, homelessness/transience, cultural oppression/colonization, being able to access MH services etc.) This preliminary investigation found several reviews related to bullying and violence prevention in schools. Most of these reviews were not clear in their abstracts about the implications for mental health. If aggression, bullying and violence are solely caused by psychological factors, then it would make sense to add more of these reviews here. But clearly the are social, economic and other factors causing anti-social behaviours as well. In practical terms, it comes down to schools working with police or with psychologists. Similarly, we are aware of several systematic reviews of school programs and approaches to prevent substance abuse. Indeed, the ISHN World Encyclopedia includes a similar, very extensive list in our School Substance Abuse Prevention Bibliography/Toolbox. We chose not to include those many, many reviews here. Obviously, the interactions between mental health and violence and addictions need to be sorted out, or the emerging concern for MH may end up duplicating much of the work that has already been done in substance abuse prevention and in promoting safe & caring schools. Our investigation did not find any reviews examining the co-occurrence of MH problems with other health and social challenges facing youth, including teen pregnancy, homophobic bullying, discrimination/cultural oppression, child abuse, child sexual abuse, trauma and many others. Wei & Kutcher (2011) suggest that several reviews have addressed the issue of school-based interventions to reduce violence and aggressive behaviors in children and youth.36-40 These reviews included universal, selective, and targeted school-based programs from the elementary to high school ages. Reductions in aggressive behavior were more evident in high-risk youth across most studies, but universal programs were found to have a positive although more modest effect in the overall school environment. | Preventing, Reducing Aggression/ Violence/Anti-social Behaviour
|
| Delaying Onset or Managing Mental Illness and Disorders (Including ADHD, FASD, overcoming stigma/seeking help, anxiety, phobias, eating disorders, behavior disorders, emotional/mood disorders, depression, aggression, self-harm, suicide, bi-polar disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis, other disorders etc. Wei and Kutcher (2011) also suggest that the evidence of prevention of anxiety programs was presented in tw2 recent systematic reviews. Of 30 programs (universal, selective, and indicative) most were CBT as well as psychoeducation, relaxation, and modeling. They found that most of the universal and indicated programs were effective in reducing symptoms of anxiety in the short term and several studies in Australia (FRIENDS program) show some long-term effectiveness as well. The guidance document prepared by the UK National Institute on Clinical Evidence clearly captures a consensus that schools can be part of a network of children’s services. Wei & Kutcher (2011) suggest that the evidence for effective suicide prevention programs in the school setting is very limited and based on two recent systematic reviews. Although some curriculum-based programs have improved knowledge and attitudes toward mental illness, very few such programs were evident in preventing suicidal behaviors or had demonstrated program safety. Results suggested only individual CBT-based intervention showed some promising evidence of effectiveness. Wei and Kutcher (2011) suggest that two recent, systematic reviews have addressed the prevention of eating disorders. In summarizing the findings from more than 40 studies, there was no evidence of harm for school-based eating disorder programs. Targeted/selective programs were more effective than universal programs in behavior change. In addition, programs using interactive approaches were more beneficial than traditional didactic methods. Finally, media literacy and advocacy have a positive impact on changing societal body image ideal | Delaying or Managing Onset of Disorders/Illnesses
Preventing, Reducing or Managing FASD
Reducing Stigma, Increasing Help Seeking
|
| C-4 Effectiveness of Whole School (HPS) Strategies (involving only school-based personnel in delivery) Our search through the research reviews on the SMH Bibliography/toolbox found that most of the research reviews were focused on this level op operations. In other words, most of the multi-intervention programs that have been examined rarely involve staff other than those employed in school systems and almost all of the activity is to be taken on by the front-line staff working in schools. | |
| On overall health and development (eg bullying/aggression, overweight/obesity, physical activity, sexual risk-taking, educational achievement/school dropout etc. | |
| On the issue of overall mental health Our search of the SMH Bibliography/Toolbox found several reviews recommending a “whole school” strategy that had educators engaged in several different types of interventions. |
|
| On specific aspects, behaviours, conditions related to the issue | |
| Promoting Positive Mental Health (Including psychological well-being, social and psychological assets, mental health literacy, spiritual/religious beliefs, mindfulness/self-knowledge, self-esteem, attachment, etc.) According to Wei & Kuthcher (2012) Two systematic reviews of pro-social and social/emotional well-being school interventions have identified the potential value of such school based mental health promotion programs, especially those utilizing a whole school approach involving students, educators, families, and the wider community. As noted earlier with coordinated agency-school board programs, the reviews we located in the SMH Bibliography/Toolbox supported programs promoting SEL but did not cover other aspects of “positive mental health”. |
|
| Preventing or reducing Mental Health Problems (Including resilience, bereavement, stress/distress, social isolation/loneliness, divorce/family breakdown, having parent with mental illness) | |
| Addressing Interactions with other Health/Social Problems (Including intellectual, physical and learning disabilities, teen pregnancy/adoption, sexual health/risk-taking, sexual orientation, child sexual abuse, child abuse & neglect, family violence, bullying/aggression, discrimination based on gender, race, language, religion, substance abuse, chronic disease, genetic conditions, trauma from violence, poverty, homelessness/transience, cultural oppression/colonization, being able to access MH services etc. | |
| Delaying Onset or Managing Mental Illness and Disorders (Including ADHD, FASD, overcoming stigma/seeking help, anxiety, phobias, eating disorders, behavior disorders, emotional/mood disorders, depression, aggression, self-harm, suicide, bi-polar disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis, other disorders etc.) |
|
| C-5 Effects of Programs on Learning (Educational achievement and school effectiveness) There is increasing attention being paid to the effect of various school health programs on student learning and overall school effectiveness. The research on Social Emotional Learning has certainly reached the level of systematic reviews in reporting that improved SEL has academic benefits. There are many similar claims being made about school “connectedness” and other aspects of mental health in recent articles and studies being published recently. However, we did not locate any systematic reviews reporting that programs to improve overall mental health, aspects of MH other than SEL and the reduction/delayed onset of specific MH problems or illnesses had similar effects. |
|
| D. Effectiveness of Individual Evidence-based Interventions (Differentiate among primary, secondary, tertiary prevention of health promotion, prevention, assistance, rehabilitation etc.) | |
| D-1 Policy Interventions (Includes laws, by-laws, professional guidelines, ministries policies, school board, health authority and other agency policies and school procedures) | Effects of policy (alone) interventions on MH (eg Anti-bullying rules, mandatory inclusiveness etc)
|
| D-2 Instructional Interventions (Health education research suggests we focus on general as well as specific skills, specific functional knowledge, normative beliefs, teacher skills, support for instruction, better scope/sequence of curricula, teaching/learning materials, teaching methods, teacher education and training, parent involvement in at-home learning, web-based learning etc.) The ISHN synthesis of other school programs suggests that knowledge alone from instruction only interventions usually does not change health and social behaviours. While practical knowledge, skills, normative beliefs, self-knowledge and behavioural intentions (personal health action plans) can be taught in classroom, instructional programs and basic health literacy may only be a prerequisite for behaviour change. The SH research in instructional programs has generally concluded that behavioural effects are time limited (1-3 years) and focused on small changes. However, we do not hold other instructional programs (eg Language Arts programs) to be accountable for life long reading habits, so perhaps we should be realistic about the effects of health education programs as well. Applications to Mental health The research reviews found in the SMH Bibliography/Toolbox seem to reflect that overall trend in health instructional program, with most of the reviews reporting that instructional program results are mixed or short term. Wei & Kutcher (2011) state that one review of school instructional programs designed to reduce stigma toward mental illness suggests some evidence that mental health curricula designed to educate children and youth about stigma toward mental illness may be beneficial in positively changing students’ attitudes and behavior (at least in the short term). Second, they suggest that mental health literacy should be considered as a foundation for school mental health for all stakeholders involved (eg, students, teachers, parents, student service providers, primary care health providers). A mental health curriculum can be a starting point to facilitate the understanding of mental health and mental illness, change attitudes toward mental illness, and encourage help-seeking behaviors for children and youth. This type of approach should embed mental health education into usual school learning paradigms to enhance knowledge acquisition and address attitudinal and behavioral modifications within an already acceptable mode of delivery. Educators, with appropriate knowledge and training, may be more likely to promote mental health in their everyday activities, identify children and youth at risk for mental health problems, and work more collaboratively with families and health care providers. | Social & Emotional Learning
|
| D-3 Health, Social Services, Educational and Other Services Interventions (ISHN suggests that this includes school-based and linked clinics, screening services, early identification and referral, coordination with schools in treatment, individual educational programs, alternative schools and classes, in-school management of the illness/condition, coordination with the school from family, social, youth, addictions, mental health, early childhood, police, sports/recreation and employment services, coordination with the school during rehabilitation/re-integration etc) This investigation found that there appears to be a clear consensus in the research about how school based and school-linked mental health services should be delivered. A number of reviews identified in the SMH Bibliography/toolbox report on specific gains on specific mental health problems and illnesses. School-based and school-linked clinics, family support programs that include cooperation from schools and therapeutic counselling and other forms of counselling appear to have an effect, especially if they are based on Cognitive Behavior Theory. |
|
| D-4 Social Support Interventions (Includes school staff/volunteer awareness of the issue, parent information, education and support, student leadership programs, after school programs, peer helper programs, student clubs, working with community-based organizations, programs and campaigns, working with local media outlets, working with social media, use of the Internet etc. ) This investigation found several research reviews suggesting that parent and youth involvement, after school programs and staff wellness programs can improve mental health. However, the evidence from these systematic reviews is not as clear as one would hope. |
|
| D-5 Physical Environment Interventions (Including access to practical resources) (Includes school grounds, facilities, transportation to and from school, provision of specialized or other equipment) | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| E. Implementation and Sustainability (Including the use of Evidenced-based, Practical and Strategic Implementation Strategies, diffusion or education change theories, Capacity-building/Continuous Improvement Strategies and Strategic Consideration of System/Agency/School Characteristics (eg teacher work life research-use of lesson plans, school improvement research, open, loosely-coupled, bureaucratic systems) | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| E-1 Use of Evidence-based Implementation Models, Practical Considerations and Strategic Implementation Strategies Our monitoring of recent SMH journals and research has alerted us to the fact that there are numerous recent investigations on implementation processes. However, it does not appear that these many recent studies have been synthesized in systematic reviews. | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| E-2 Use of Diffusion and Education Change Knowledge/Theory | |
| E-3 Use of Baseline Capacity, Capacity-Building Knowledge/Theory and Sustainability The ISHN synthesis suggests that we need to build capacity at all levels in the multiple systems that need to be engaged with school health promotion, social development, safety and the environment. | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Descriptions and Reports on Baseline Capacity Required on the Issue (Including minimum curriculum time, staff qualifications, staffing ratios, wait times and minimum service delivery requirements etc. on the issue) | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| General use of capacity-building/organizational development theory and practices | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Specific capacities (according to WHO model adapted by the School Health Research Network in Canada) | |
| Coordinated Policies & Leadership | |
| Staff Assigned to Coordination | No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Informal/formal Mechanisms for Cooperation |
|
| Ongoing Knowledge Development, Synthesis, Transfer, Exchange Wei & Kutcher (2011) suggest that “more than half of school mental health research reports originate currently from the United States, and many school mental health models have been developed International School Mental Health specific to this setting, and not necessarily applicable to other countries. It is essential that other countries with different education and health systems invest more in the development and evaluation of school mental health policies and programs, make those evaluations known globally, and for countries to both network and share their findings through a global network where the most effective components can be identified and extrapolated to diverse environments. Fourth. The development and independent testing of various school mental health approaches will increase credibility and visibility of global mental health programs. Linking research expertise across countries at different levels of development can accelerate research competency development. Such research capacity building will enhance the quality of existing school mental health research as well as provide support needed for developing countries to move the school mental health agenda forward in their countries. Finally, school mental health requires global funding priority. At this time, the vast majority of global health and health-related development funding does not go to mental health. Both national development agencies and large international donors need to be engaged in the development and application of school mental health initiatives. For this to occur, a strong global school mental health database, demonstrating the effectiveness, safety, and cost effectiveness of various school mental health initiatives needs to be created and publicized.” | |
| Ongoing Workforce Development |
|
| Regular Monitoring and Reporting on health/social development, learning and program capacity | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Strategic Management of Emerging Issues/Trends | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Explicit plan for sustainability | · Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., and Schellinger, K. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions.Child Development, 82,474-501 |
| E-4 Consideration of Sustainability (Includes defining and applying the concept, routinization, factors that support and barriers | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| E-5 Consideration of Ecology and System Characteristics (This section list studies that specifically examine the attributes of school and other systems with a view to implementation and sustainability gains) | |
| General Use of Ecological Approach/Systems thinking | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Specific Applications of Ecological/Systems Thinking & Characteristics | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Openness (Includes concepts such as system adaptation, stasis and stability, open systems theory, boundaries between and within organizations, system-environment interactions, change in context, etc) | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Loose-coupling between levels in the system (Includes concepts such as adopter concerns, policy levers, ecology/micro-politics of schools, role/style of senior leaders, role/style of middle managers, role/style of front-line staff) | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Professional Bureaucracies (Includes concepts such as multi-level systems, influence of structure, internal communications (formal and informal), social networks within organizations, non-rational decision-making, knowledge as power and influence, organizational culture, readiness for innovation, professional norms/ideologies, sociology and work life, career patterns for teachers, nurses, police officers) | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Working across Multiple Systems (Includes concepts such as degree of cooperation (communication-collaboration-merger etc), cooperation at different levels in systems) | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| F Consideration of Community, Country or Cultural Contexts | |
| F-1. General references to local community/neighbourhood context Wei & Kutcher (2011) First, the mental health of children and youth may be most parsimoniously achieved through an integrated and comprehensive “pathway to care” framework that establishes a continuum of child and youth mental health promotion, prevention/early identification, intervention, and continuing care, with the school built in as part of this pathway. Although there is evidence of some empirically based mental health promotion, prevention, and intervention school-based programs, there is very limited information regarding long-term outcomes and sustainability. The pathway to care framework must be developed in such a way as to be comprehensive and flexible, adaptable to myriad local realities that define both health and education, with school mental health integrated as part of this approach. | · Clark, C., Myron, R., Stansfeld, S., Friedli, L., Candy, B. (2007) A systematic review of the evidence on the effect of the built and physical environment on mental health Journal of Public Mental Health Vol 6: 2: 14-27 (Identified by Health Evidence Canada) |
| F-2. Use of community analysis and planning tools, research to better understand the community and their impact on health and human development (eg transportation systems, climate, educational and cultural institutions and resources, demographics, etc.). Include the use of GIS and other mapping tools. | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| F.3 Different Types of local communities | |
| Disadvantaged Communities |
|
| Urban Communities/Inner City Communities/Multi-ethnic Communities | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Rural Communities | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Aboriginal Communities/Schools | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Faith-based/Heritage-based /Cultural Communities/Schools | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Affluent Communities/Private Schools | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| F-4 Different Types of Countries | |
| Low income countries | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Middle and High Income Countries | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| Countries/Regions Disrupted by war, conflict, disasters | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| G Consideration of and Integration within the Constraints and Educational Mandate of the School The ISHN synthesis of school prevention and promotion programs suggests that we should seek congruence with education mandate, constraints of schools. Policy-makers, decision-makers and practitioners should anticipate competition and conflicts caused by divergence or competition with the academic/ educational roles/needs of the school. For mental health, this means particular attention to student promotion and student recognition policies and procedures. There is a direct tension between the school’s mandate to accredit student learning (which includes failing students) and their mental health and connectedness to school. | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| G-1 Consideration of School's Primary Roles, Functions | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| G-2 Consideration of Professional Norms & Ideologies | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| G-3 Consideration of School's Social, Economic & Political Constraints | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| H Questions related to Future and Current Research | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| H-1 Major knowledge/practice/policy questions and draft or existing research agendas | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| H-2 Research Showing Cost-Effectiveness or Cost-Benefits and/or Economic Burden of this Problem Wei & Kutcher (2011) suggest that there is little substantive evidence to demonstrate the ESCe of many of these initiatives. The quality of research is inconsistent, the relationship between short time changes in these indicators and long-term functional outcome have not been defined, and their safety and cost effectiveness have not been established. Current evidence suggests universal programs may work better for mental health promotion; universal and selective programs may have a role in addressing violent and aggressive behaviors; selective and indicated/targeted programs may elicit better results for prevention of depression and anxiety and eating disorders may show greater response to selective programs. | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| H-3 Use of new research or multiple, mixed methods (beyond RCT’s) | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
| H-4 Methodological Issues and Questions | · No reviews found in the bibliography/toolbox |
|
dmccall |
Latest page update: made by dmccall
, Apr 1 2012, 6:57 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
14617 words added 11198 words deleted 1 image added view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|